June 2004
Back to Article Index

Asphalt Producer

Working with Polymer Modifiers

Like it or not, polymer-modified asphalt has a place in our future.
Here are some ideas on how to deal with it.

by Daniel C. Brown, Contributing Editor 

As the years unfold, it’s virtually certain that we’ll see more and more polymer-modified asphalt. Today, the majority of states have a specification for such mixes, and recent studies now confirm that polymers, when properly selected, improve asphalt’s resistance to distresses like rutting at higher temperatures, low-temperature thermal cracking, load-associated fatigue cracking, aging, and stripping of the asphalt cement from aggregates. In addition, polymers generally assure that you’ll get good stickiness, or adhesive qualities, in your mixture.

The selection of a polymer is important, says Dave Newcomb, vice president of research and technology, National Asphalt Pavement Association. “The improvements come not just from the polymer, but from the combination of the polymer with the asphalt cement. Various polymers react differently with different asphalts,” says Newcomb.

“It is likely that modified binders represent as much as 15% of the total annual tonnage of asphalt binder used in the United States; this percentage is expected to increase in the coming decade,” says the staff of the Transportation Research Board in a foreword to NCHRP 9-10, a report called Superpave Protocols for Modified Asphalt Binders.

To be sure, polymer-modified asphalt costs a bit more than unmodified, or neat, asphalt cement. Depending on the type of modification, says NCHRP 9-10, the cost per ton of a modified binder may be 50 to 100% greater than that of neat asphalt cement, translating to an increase of 10 to 20% in the cost of the in-place asphalt.

The fundamentals

A polymer is a large molecule that is made up of many small chemical units called “monomers,” says Ron Corun, technical support manager for Citgo Asphalt Refining, Ocean City, Maryland. He notes that several types of polymers are available to modify asphalt mixtures:

  • Elastomers, or block copolymers. These include styrene butadiene and styrene butadiene styrene.

  • SBR Latex (styrene butadiene rubber).

  • Polyolefins, or plastomers. These include low-density polyethylene; reactive terpolymer (Elvaloy AM, for example); and ethylene vinyl acetate.

  • Engineered binders.

  • Crumb rubber.

  • Chemical modifiers.

“A plastomer will generally stiffen the asphalt to increase its high-temperature performance,” says Dr. Mark Buncher, director of field engineering at the Asphalt Institute. “For surface mixtures, this results in greater resistance to rutting and deformation. For intermediate and base layers that have been modified, it also means an increased structural strength of the pavement system which the newer mechanistic-empirical thickness design procedures will consider.”

In contrast, Buncher explains, an elastomer will generally both stiffen and increase the flexibility or stretchiness of the asphalt, improving both high- and low-temperature performance. “An elastomeric binder will rebound after being stretched, so the asphalt mixture is better able to recover from the stresses that occur under heavy loadings and from the thermal stresses that build up with extreme cold temperatures,” he says.

Many states find the improved performance of polymer modification to be worth the cost, especially for high-traffic-volume pavements (see chart). Mississippi, for example, requires PMA for the top two courses of any pavement designed for 3 million or more equivalent single-axle loadings. In fact, says Jimmy Brumfield, the state materials engineer, suppliers are required to start with a PG 67-22 binder, then add polymer to bump it up to PG 76-22.

The PG 67-22 is equivalent to the old AC 30 binder, which worked well in Mississippi’s hot climate, says Brumfield. “We didn’t want AC 20; it was too soft,” says Brumfield. “So to eliminate that possibility, we make the suppliers start with the PG 67-22, then modify that to get the PG 76-22.” In his state, Brumfield says polymer adds between $3 and $5 per ton of mix, which increases the cost of mix to about $38 to $42 per ton of mix paved.

To specify polymers, most states use what are called SHRP-plus, or PG-plus, specifications. That’s because the research for the Strategic Highway Research Program developed tests for neat asphalt binders only. The new performance grade system did not discern the presence — and value — of polymer in the binders. It was, and is, possible to manufacture both a neat PG 64-22 and a modified PG 64-22. And yet, the modified binder will outperform the neat binder.

“It’s possible to fool the system,” says Citgo’s Corun. Not only that, but a binder supplier can provide an air-blown asphalt, one with no modifiers, that will have a higher PG rating than its original material.

“So, if you want a polymer, you specify that,” says Don Watson, research engineer for the National Center for Asphalt Technology. “A state can say that the binder must be straight-run, not air-blown, to meet the grade. Some states specify the type of polymer, such as SBS, SBR, or SB, or they may specify it by elastomer or plastomer.”

In Georgia’s department of transportation, a leader in polymer-modified asphalt usage, engineers go as far as to specify the so-called “phase angle” of the binder. The phase angle, often called delta, is an indicator of the relative amounts of recoverable and non-recoverable deformation, according to The Asphalt Institute’s SP-1 manual. The phase angle is measured using a dynamic shear rheometer, then plotting the material’s viscous behavior (y-axis) versus its elastic behavior (x-axis). An asphalt binder with relatively more elastic behavior than viscous behavior will have a lower phase angle.

Some states use a forced ductility test, Watson says. That test measures the force required to stretch a binder. With a polymer-modified binder, the stretched strand will be thicker than with a neat asphalt. “With a neat asphalt, you get a hair-like strand,” says Watson.

And some states have a separation test, which measures the degree of separation of the binder from the polymer when the blended material is stored. “Some states require that contractors have agitation systems that prevent separation,” Watson says.

Higher temperatures

Most contractors and state officials with PMA experience will tell you that running polymer mixes requires higher mix temperatures in order to assure that the paving crew can achieve the required density. But how much higher is quite another question.

“If the producer doesn’t make hotter mix, then the mix could require him to put forth more compactive effort,” says Mississippi’s Brumfield. But making hotter mix can raise environmental issues, such as blue smoke, or issues with fumes and worker health. What is more, overheating the PMA mixture can prematurely age the material.

So, Mississippi limits the high-end mixture temperature to 340 degrees F. At higher temperatures than that, Brumfield says, “You’ll age-harden the mix. I want to preserve that durability for use on the roadway!”

Dan Gallagher, vice president of Gallagher Asphalt, a hot-mix producer based in Thornton, Illinois, advises communication. “Work closely with your binder supplier,” he says. “They know the temperature-viscosity curve of various binders. You want to make sure you achieve your compaction temperature. Polymers tighten the range of temperatures for compaction.”

Typically, says Gallagher, a polymer asphalt might require a mix temperature leaving the plant of about 320 degrees F and 305 degrees behind the paver.

Tips for producers

In a presentation at World of Asphalt in March, Citgo’s Corun made the following recommendations for producers making polymer asphalt.

  • Use a dedicated storage tank for your polymerized binder. Not doing so risks contaminating your polymerized material and changing its temperature grade.

  • Either vertical or horizontal binder tanks are satisfactory, but a vertical tank provides more efficient agitation.

  • When reheating modified binders after a cold winter, heat it up slowly, in 20-degree increments. Allow about a week to get it working.

  • Polymer-modified binder is more difficult to pump than neat binder, because it’s stickier. So if your pump runs near the upper limit of amperage for neat binder, the circuit breaker may kick off the pump for polymer.

  • The same pump calibration should work for polymer as for neat binder. Put the strainer in if you’re running polymer.

  • PMA will increase the electrical draw on your slat conveyor. If you run near the upper limit with unmodified asphalt, you may need to warm up the slat conveyor first with regular asphalt, then switch to the PMA.

  • Don’t store PMA overnight in the silo.

  • Be sure your release agent works on truck beds, because the polymerized material is stickier.

  • Tighten down the tarps on trucks so that air can’t dry out the mixture.

At Callaghan Asphalt, Chicago Heights, Illinois, plant superintendent Joe McGuire heartily recommends E-Soy, a biodegradable release agent. The material is approved by the EPA and the Illinois DOT, and McGuire says “It’s worked really well for us.”

In Mississippi, Brumfield has confidence in the value of polymers. “We have done some research on different types of polymers,” he says. “I believe that polymers will increase the life of any asphalt pavement. A polymer will not make a bad mix good, but it can make a bad mix better.

“We feel that a polymer can extend the life of a pavement by 10 to 15%,” Brumfield adds. “If we can get one more year out of an HMA pavement, it saves the taxpayers millions of dollars.” BR

AMAP (below) is dedicated to informing the industry about modified binders.


For More Information

Association of Modified Asphalt Producers: P.O. Box 270006, St. Louis, Missouri 63127; www.modifiedasphalt.org; 314-843-2627. Bob Berkley is executive director. A stated purpose of AMAP is “to inform and educate owners, contractors, and specifying agencies about the...benefits of modified asphalt binders.” Members include modified asphalt producers, suppliers, companies that provide services and equipment to regular and supplier members, and Friends of the Association.

Asphalt Institute: Research Park Drive, P.O. Box 14052, Lexington, Kentucky 40512-4052; www.asphaltinstitute.org. Members are international petroleum asphalt producers, manufacturers, and affiliated businesses. AI’s mission is to promote the use, benefits, and quality performance of petroleum asphalt.  

National Asphalt Pavement Association: 5100 Forbes Blvd., Lanham, Maryland, 20706-4413; 301-731-4748; www.hotmix.org. NAPA members include the nation’s leading hot-mix asphalt producers and contractor firms, as well as those who supply equipment and services for HMA pavements.

NAPA publication: Best Management Practices to Minimize Emissions During HMA Construction is available for $2.50 from NAPA. It contains a table of storage temperatures and plant mixing temperatures for various PG ratings of binders, up to PG 82-22. The table is helpful in setting your mix temperatures, but experts recommend working closely with your binder supplier.

Reprinted from Better Roads Magazine
June 2004

 

Click Here to return to article index

Copyright © 2004 James Informational Media, Inc.
All rights reserved.

Home/Site Map
 
Buyers Guide
Supplier/Equipment
Information
Products
Top Products & More!
Industry Links
Associations, Suppliers,
DOT's, Counties
Article Archive
A popular Starting Point
Articles and News
Event Calendar
Trade Shows/Exhibits
& Events
RoadFax Forms
On-Line inquiry form
Advertising
Rate Card,
Advertising Information
Circulation
Subscription Form
Editorial
Editorial Calendar,
Submission Guidelines
Search  Classifieds Contact Us