February 2004
Back to Article Index

Better Bridges

New York Stretches Bridge Deck Life

A water-proofing membrane stopped rot on Fire Island Inlet Bridge.

by Frank Constantino

New York’s Robert Moses Causeway carries approximately 30,000 vehicles each day. It is a route which sees a marked increase in traffic levels during the summer months as New Yorkers strive to escape the oppressive heat of the city and the surrounding suburbs by visiting the resorts of Jones and Fire Island Beaches.

The Fire Island Inlet Bridge, which is an integral part of the Causeway, is a two-lane, steel arch span and causeway with a concrete deck that carries Route 908 over Fire Island Inlet.

Construction of the Bridge was completed in 1964 and although a relatively young structure, less than 40-years old, its concrete deck has suffered from severe chloride ingress resulting in cracks, spalling, and the formation of potholes.

Studies carried out on the substrate and the rate of corrosion indicated that no protective waterproofing system was used on the deck when the bridge was built. The extent of the deterioration is such that the New York State Department of Transportation, which took over responsibility for the maintenance of the structure in 1977, is soon to begin design studies to replace the bridge, highlighting the importance and cost-effectiveness of installing a water-proofing system during the initial construction.

Any new structure built as a result of these design studies, in the longer term, will give the opportunity to alleviate some of the congestion at this well known choke point as the increasing recreational activity on Fire Island generates more traffic. However, in the meantime, the NYSDOT wished to extend the life of the current structure by preventing further chloride ingress and slowing the rate of corrosion.

To achieve these goals a complete refurbishment of the deck was vital.

Taking action

The design engineers on the project, Hardesty & Hanover, to meet the client’s brief, specified the use of an effective, proven spray-applied waterproofing membrane used in conjunction with a 0.75-inch micro-surfacing overlay.

This combination would not only achieve the client’s goal of extending the life of the structure, but milling 0.75-inch of the concrete surfacing and replacing it with the same depth of micro-surfacing would ensure matching with existing joint elevations. More importantly the specified system would be lightweight — reducing dead load, could be applied rapidly minimizing disruption to traffic, and would be very cost effective. The waterproofing system also needed to provide an excellent bond to the concrete deck. Specs called for the system to follow the contours of the milled deck and have no vulnerable seams or joints.

Hardesty & Hanover specified the use of Stirling Lloyd’s Eliminator system. The system is a rapid-curing, seamless, spray-applied waterproofing membrane based on methyl-methacrylate resins.

The system was selected at least partially for its past performance in similar circumstances. The shear forces exerted on the waterproofing/wearing course interface when using micro-surfacing are far greater than those associated with normal surfacing depths. The Eliminator system has proved that its bond to micro-surfacing can withstand these forces.

For example, the system had already been very successfully used in conjunction with micro-surfacing on the Manhattan and Queensboro Bridges in New York City, which are subjected to much heavier loads and much higher traffic densities.

Spraying

The system, being liquid applied, could cope with the contours of the rough, milled-concrete deck and its rapid spray application. Its fast cure ensured that the maintenance work would cause minimum possible disruption, a major consideration.

The contract to apply the system was awarded to Venture Construction of Pembroke, New Hampshire. Once the deck had been correctly prepared, Venture Construction crews spray applied Stirling Lloyd’s PAR1 methyl-methacrylate primer to the substrate. This sealed the deck and enhanced the adhesion of the subsequent membrane to the deck.

Once the primer had cured, typically in under an hour, the Eliminator membrane was spray applied in two color-contrasting coats to aid quality control and ensure the integrity of the membrane.

As part of the unique on-site quality assurance program, adhesion tests were carried out to confirm that the adhesion to the concrete was greater than the 100 psi required by the specification. Wet film thickness checks were used to constantly monitor the thickness of the membrane to ensure that the required thickness was achieved.

The first coat, pigmented yellow, was applied to give a thickness of 80 mils. Once this had cured, the application of the second coat began. Pigmented grey, this was applied to give a thickness of 40 mils.

While still in its liquid state, aggregate was broadcast into the membrane to provide a mechanical shear key, enhancing the bond to the subsequently applied micro-surfacing.

The contractor was able, despite the work restrictions imposed by the traffic management system and the work schedule of the micro-surfacing operation, to apply the complete system to the 111,000 square feet of deck in just 12 days.

Once application had taken place, the system could be trafficked in under an hour.


Frank Constantino represents Stirling Lloyd.

Reprinted from Better Roads Magazine
February 2004

 

Click Here to return to article index

Copyright © 2004 James Informational Media, Inc.
All rights reserved.

Home/Site Map
 
Buyers Guide
Supplier/Equipment
Information
Products
Top Products & More!
Industry Links
Associations, Suppliers,
DOT's, Counties
Article Archive
A popular Starting Point
Articles and News
Event Calendar
Trade Shows/Exhibits
& Events
RoadFax Forms
On-Line inquiry form
Advertising
Rate Card,
Advertising Information
Circulation
Subscription Form
Editorial
Editorial Calendar,
Submission Guidelines
Search  Classifieds Contact Us