May 2002
Back to Article Index

Better Bridges

Rehab, Painting Save Oregon Bridge

The northbound structure of the twin Interstate-5 bridge needed new paint and minor structural rehabilitation. The 1917 lift-span bridge was extensively rehabilitated after a new southbound structure was built in 1958.

Despite several substantial construction and maintenance upgrades since then, a great deal of maintenance and repair remained.

Three coats of lead-based paint were eroded by the elements and undermined by rust, compromising the structure’s surface. The bridge’s structural integrity was at risk in the long run if left unattended.

On site

The Oregon Department of Transportation’s contractor, Certified Coatings of Concord, California, began a $17-million project to paint and rehabilitate the northbound span of the Interstate-5 bridge over the Columbia River.

The bridge had not been painted since 1966. Three coats of lead-based paint had to be removed. Work was done by encapsulating the bridge to prevent environmental contamination during the paint removal and replacement process.

There were a few new things to learn about the old bridge when it came to painting the over one-million square feet of steel that makes up the structure. An initial learning curve, followed by staging complications and equipment breakdown, contributed to a slower schedule than originally planned. At press time, the project was nearing completion.

The 13 spans were rehabilitated and painted with lead-free, corrosion-inhibiting green paint.

Three travel lanes were maintained during most of the project. There were occasional nighttime/early morning lane closures on I-5 and on the bridge to move the encapsulation structure as the work progressed on the bridge’s steel framework.

The encapsulation structure appeared as a tunnel to the motorist. The entrance of this structure was illuminated to reduce the visual impact and to clearly identify its perimeter.

Despite a clearly marked construction zone, many motorists drove 10 to 15 miles over the posted 45-miles-per-hour speed limit. This created a safety issue for both motorists and construction workers.

Overheight/width vehicles were restricted from using the northbound span. To avoid striking (contact with) the work-area structure, transportation officials suggested that in-compliance truck traffic use the center lane when it was possible.

An audible warning system was used to alert overheight vehicles. Signs directed errant drivers to take the Jantzen Beach Exit 308.

River traffic was affected as construction crews worked overhead on the bridge’s long span. The first phase involved 150 feet of the Oregon end of the 550-foot span.

The contractor’s work area extended below the underside of the bridge by 6 feet, lessening the clearance from the bridge to the river. This clearance restriction prevented most river traffic from using the long span to pass beneath the bridge and increased use of the lift-span. 


This article courtesy of the Oregon Department of Transportation.

Reprinted from Better Roads Magazine
May 2002

 

Click Here to return to article index

Copyright © 2002 James Informational Media, Inc.
All rights reserved.

Home/Site Map
 
Buyers Guide
Supplier/Equipment
Information
Products
Top Products & More!
Industry Links
Associations, Suppliers,
DOT's, Counties
Article Archive
A popular Starting Point
Articles and News
Event Calendar
Trade Shows/Exhibits
& Events
RoadFax Forms
On-Line inquiry form
Advertising
Rate Card,
Advertising Information
Circulation
Subscription Form
Editorial
Editorial Calendar,
Submission Guidelines
Search  Classifieds Contact Us