November 2003
Back to Article Index

Better Bridges

Inventory Shows Slow Bridge Condition Improvement

Bridge conditions have improved slightly, according to the Better Roads’ 2003 Bridge Inventory, but agencies face serious challenges in trying to continue this trend.

by Ruth W. Stidger, Editor-in-Chief

The recently released American Society of Civil Engineers infrastructure rating confirms Better Roads’ own 2003 Bridge Inventory findings.

Bridge conditions are in a holding pattern, rating a C on the ASCE Progress Report Card and improving only marginally in our own 2003 study.

A look at creeping improvement shows that the percent of structurally deficient or functionally obsolete bridges went from 29% in 1998 to 27.5% in 2000 to 25.8% or 153,420 bridges this year.

Bridges evaluated are 20 feet or more in length. A functionally obsolete bridge has older design features and can’t accommodate current traffic volumes, vehicle sizes, and weights.

Structurally deficient bridges are closed or are weight and/or speed restricted.

Deficient or obsolete bridges contribute greatly to congestion. And congestion leads to another poor ASCE grade — our nation’s roads were given a D+ on the ASCE 2003 Progress Report Card.

State report cards

Wisconsin and Kentucky infrastructure report cards were released in September along with the nationwide ASCE report.

Wisconsin’s bridges rated a B-. About 20% of the state’s bridges need replacement or rehabilitation, the report says, showing a significant improvement over the past 20 years.

Even so, funding beyond current levels will be needed to continue reducing the backlog of deficient Wisconsin bridges, the report states.

Kentucky’s bridges received a C- rating. About 31% of the state’s bridges are structurally deficient or functionally obsolete. This figure shows real progress compared to the 36% a decade ago.

Available funding won’t pay to continue the trend, though, and new resources are needed.

Money, money, money

One hundred percent of state department of transportation bridge engineers responding to a Better Roads Bridge Inventory Editorial Survey said funding availability is their greatest challenge in lowering their rate of deficient bridges.

“Additional funds are needed for both construction contracts and maintenance activities,” warns Jim Pierce, bridge management at the Minnesota Bridge and Structures Division.

Increasing traffic outpaces bridge capacity in many parts of the country, and this is so in many parts of Florida, says DOT Engineer of Structure Maintenance John Harris. Increased funding is needed.

Some engineers dream of a long-term rehab and replacement plan, and the money to finance it.

“Like many western states, Utah is experiencing rapid growth along with an aging of its infrastructure,” says Utah DOT Deputy Bridge Engineer Dave Eixenberger. “Our greatest challenge is balancing the needs between the remaining structural life of a bridge and its remaining functional life (typically traffic driven). Uncertainty in funding further complicates the situation. However, recent efforts in Asset Management are giving us better planning tools to accomplish this task.”

In Alabama, Assistant State Maintenance Engineer of Bridges George Conner would like to see increased state funding for bridge maintenance.

Bill Dittrich, inspection engineer at the Indiana Department of Transportation, says counties especially need more funding for bridge work.

Ties to federal money and the accompanying requirements can lengthen county projects, for example.

Damage control

Before you can control damage, you need to pinpoint its main causes.

Better Roads survey results show that 61% of responding department of transportation engineers cite bridge age as a major factor in bridge damage.

Corrosion was given as a cause of damage by 48% of survey respondents.

More than a third — 35% — said more traffic than the bridge was designed to carry caused damage or obsolescence.

Environmentally speaking

Do environmental restrictions affect how well an agency performs in replacing or repairing bridges. Yes, replied 56% of Better Roads survey respondents.

In Alaska, Chief Bridge Engineer Richard Pratt says that in-winter work permits are hard to get, limiting the already-short Alaskan construction season.

Air-conformity restrictions can cause problems when it’s necessary to build a bigger bridge than the structure it’s replacing, says Utah’s Dave Eixenberger.

Others see environmental restrictions as a nuisance at best — one that extends the permitting process for plan development and adds to costs.

“Environmental issues have been increasing design and construction costs of all structures,” says South Dakota DOT Bridge Inventory/Inspection Engineer Tracy M. Painter.

Local bridges are most likely to face environmental restriction problems, says Indiana’s Bill Dittrich. “Historical aspects seem to be more of a problem for local bridges,” he says.

What’s ahead?

Will states be able to lower their rates of deficient bridges in 2004? Yes, replied 57% of respondents.

At the Massachusetts Highway Department, Bridge Engineer Alexander Bardow says that the DOT expects to receive more money in 2004, which will let them do more preservation and other bridge work.

In Arkansas, State Highway Transportation Department Bridge Engineer Phil Brand says that they will replace several deficient Interstate bridges as the fourth year of their five-year Interstate Rehabilitation Program. This program is in addition to the state’s normal bridge replacement program.

The truth is, though, that these engineers are among the exceptions with their plans and careful figuring.

Many states don’t have the money or an adequate plan to decrease the numbers of deficient bridges.

Until this fact changes, we can expect more mediocre grades from the ASCE and from the drivers on our roads who must deal with lost time and other problems often stemming from inadequate bridges.

About Better Roads Bridge Inventory

Every year, Better Roads researchers conduct an inventory of bridge conditions, including measurement of structurally deficient or functionally obsolete bridges.

The real significance of this inventory is its timeliness. It presents current data and precedes similar governmental statistics release by about a year.

Click Here for 2003 Bridge Inventory Page

Reprinted from Better Roads Magazine
November 2003

 

Click Here to return to article index

Copyright © 2003 James Informational Media, Inc.
All rights reserved.

Home/Site Map
 
Buyers Guide
Supplier/Equipment
Information
Products
Top Products & More!
Industry Links
Associations, Suppliers,
DOT's, Counties
Article Archive
A popular Starting Point
Articles and News
Event Calendar
Trade Shows/Exhibits
& Events
RoadFax Forms
On-Line inquiry form
Advertising
Rate Card,
Advertising Information
Circulation
Subscription Form
Editorial
Editorial Calendar,
Submission Guidelines
Search  Classifieds Contact Us